Currently, New York City is trying an experiment with its so-called stabilized rental housing: freezing rent increases for at least a year. Many people are cheering the move, but if it continues, they may learn some basics of housing that is making everyone, even building owners, shake their heads nationally.
As the Rent Guidelines Board explains, rent stabilization is a form of rent regulation enacted in 1969 when rents in post-war buildings were rising sharply. It is intended to “provide three interrelated protections to tenants while permitting a fair return to owners who invest in rental property.”
The three protections are basic affordability, with reasonable annual rent increases; habitability of the premises; and security of tenure, with effectively permanent residency, though with rights and obligations defined by law.
There is also a question of whether the property owners can get fair returns. That comes back to the 0% rent increases for the coming year, which New York Weekly called “historic.”
The result of the vote was predetermined by promises Mayor Zohran Mamdani made during his campaign because he appointed six new members out of the total nine. There wasn’t a doubt how things would go.
The board said the 0% increase was a “fair and responsible approach this year,” Board Chair Chantella Mitchell reportedly said, given affordability challenges and pressures the building owners have faced. The RGB pointed to the cost of operating buildings with rent-stabilized units running 5.3% over the past year, compared to national inflation of 2.7%.
But they said that net operating incomes — the income a property generates after taking out operating expenses but before financing costs, taxes, or capital expenditures — were up 6.2% over the last year. That might sound like staying ahead of costs, but when things like financing and taxes are taken out, it doesn’t necessarily mean they’re making money. They could technically be losing it. Growth of levied taxes on commercial real estate across the city was 3.0%.
The reason to bring this up is not to cover for landlords nor wag a finger. New York isn’t a normal place when it comes to real estate. However, sometimes extreme cases can offer important insight into how systems work.
The issues in apartment pricing can include greed beyond the vision of avarice, certainty. And yet, there are basic housing issues that come down to money. Depending on where you look, land is ridiculously expensive. Construction labor, with its current shortage, is expensive. Materials, especially with tariffs, are expensive. Financing is expensive.
Investors, who put the money up that allows construction of new housing, also want a strong profit from the entire business. That may seem unfair, but it doesn’t matter in a way because if they can’t get the profit they seek, they’ll invest in something else.
This is why federal and state governments offer options like tax breaks for people who put in the money that’s needed. Is that the best answer? Hard to tell because the country is in massive debt and spending more means borrowing more, which adds onto the pile of money owned by the country. Governments can’t order land prices or cost of construction materials down on whim.
And yet, something has to give. Maybe encourage people to move to areas that have been losing population for some time and where the cost of living is significantly lower. But there are no easy answers. And those that had their rent frozen might find there is a steeper price to pay not far in the future.
Read the full article here