Close Menu
Online 24 NewsOnline 24 News
  • Home
  • USA
  • Canada
  • UK
  • Germany
  • World
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
Trending

The Trump Administration Has Hurt Small Investors By Weaker Safeguards

August 16, 2026

Travis Kelce Flashes Wedding Band at 1st Preseason Chiefs Game After Marrying Taylor Swift

August 16, 2026

Here Are The MCU X-Men Cast Members Revealed At D23

August 16, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Login
  • For Advertisers
  • Contact
Online 24 NewsOnline 24 News
Join Us Newsletter
  • Home
  • USA
  • Canada
  • UK
  • Germany
  • World
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
Online 24 NewsOnline 24 News
  • USA
  • Canada
  • UK
  • Germany
  • World
  • Business
  • Technology
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • Entertainment
  • Sports
Home»Business
Business

The Trump Administration Has Hurt Small Investors By Weaker Safeguards

August 16, 20265 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Copy Link Email Tumblr Telegram WhatsApp

One traditional duty of the federal government is to protect investors, which means you. The protection happens through required disclosure information; limits on risky and speculative investments by people without appropriate resources; protected rights for investors; oversight of financial institutions; the ability to prosecute, fine, and jail those who break financial laws; and other mechanisms.

The Trump administration has been weakening many significant protections. The results might be advantageous to corporations, but likely not for you.

Semiannual Reporting Leaves Small Investors Partly Blind

The Securities and Exchange Commission in May proposed a change that would allow companies to return to semiannual financial filings rather than the quarterly 10-Q reports established in 1970.

“Today’s proposal is just the first step of the larger, comprehensive effort to review and reshape the current SEC rules governing public companies with respect to their ongoing reporting obligations and their ability to raise capital in the public markets,” SEC Chair Paul Atkins wrote at the time. “Over the next few months, I expect that the Commission will be considering a series of proposals that, if adopted, will not only redefine what it means to be a public company, but will make being public attractive again.”

U.K. and many European countries have allowed semiannual reporting for years, although many have continued with quarterly information to appeal to investors, especially in the U.S. And according to one tally, out of 167,802 submitted comments, 167,008, or 99.5%, opposed this.

For an analogy, if a credit card issuer sent only two statements in a year about your account — information about what has happened with something of yours — would you be comfortable?

Yes, regular reporting can be expensive. Being a public company returns much more in benefits, including easier access to capital, credibility, liquidity for shareholders, and stock-based compensation and transactions.

Letting Companies Ignore Shareholder Proposals

Shareholder proposals brought to a company’s board for potential inclusion on agendas of annual meetings is another long-standing activity. There are complaints that activists on the political left and right can use such proposals to help generate public perception on long-game bases, as I reported in Observer.com a few years ago.

More often, proposals act as the voice of shareholders. Sometimes corporate boards don’t like what some shareholders suggest and want to avoid the possibility that shareholders might decide. Technically, shareholders don’t legally own the company, which is good, because otherwise those shareholders might be personally responsible, collectively, for something the company did. Being a shareholder is a set of rights and privileges related to a corporation, not direct ownership of the business assets. The shareholders do, however, indirectly control such decisions as strategic direction or authorization of corporate mergers. The shareholders ultimately decide who serves on the company’s board to make decisions on behalf of the company — a legal entity — and the shareholders. One of the ways for boards to do that is through shareholder proposals.

There are limited time and resources to debate and vote on proposals. Board members have often actively disagreed with what some shareholders suggested. There had been a check and balance to the power of board dismissal, with the SEC reviewing exclusion decisions. But on August 14, the SEC crystallized a decision to let boards exclude as they wished without a need for approval, a new way to silence shareholders’ voices.

Pushing To Open Risky Investments For Retail Investors

In 2020, the SEC started to push for retail investors to invest in private equity. As recent history has shown, such investments are opaque (you can’t see what’s really going on), largely illiquid (you can’t easily get out if things are going badly), and you become the product (because the big money interests need your cash to help bolster things in tough times).

Dalia Blass, director of the investment management division at the SEC at the time, thought that “main street investors had been left ‘on the outside looking in’ because defined contribution pension plans [like 401(k)s] did not provide access to private investments such as private equity, hedge funds and real estate.”

The Department of Labor interpreted a May 2020 executive order of Donald Trump to mean that retirement funds could include private equity. And yet, pension plans typically need stable investment vehicles. The money absolutely must be there in future years when people retire. Otherwise, their futures have been flushed down the tubes.

A Slap In The Face

Enforcement at the SEC has slowed. “Amid workforce reductions at the SEC and a targeted reorganization of the Enforcement Division, new enforcement actions fell to 313—the lowest in a decade and down 27% from FY 2024—and the new SEC administration initiated only four actions against public companies and/or subsidiaries during FY 2025,” wrote Harris Fischman, Lorin Reisner, and Jessica Carey, partners at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, in an article on the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance website.

“Total monetary settlements also declined 45% to $808 million,” they continued. “However, the new leadership has indicated it will continue to pursue cases involving retail investor harm.”

Forget that, though, as Donald Trump has “pardoned an unusually high number of wealthy people accused of financial crimes, according to an NBC News analysis of the last four administrations.” More than half of 88 individual pardons in 2025 were for white-collar crimes, and full pardons can eliminate fines to the government and restitution to victims.

On January 20m, 2026, NBC News reported that with the pardons in 2025, the financial crimes pardons represented hundreds of millions in punishments that would now disappear.

Read the full article here

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit Telegram
Facebook X (Twitter) TikTok Instagram
Copyright © 2026 YieldRadius LLP. All Rights Reserved.
  • For Advertisers
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?